The capital markets
regulator also ordered Vedanta, earlier known as Cairn India (CIL), to pay
₹77.62 crore to the Edinburgh (Scotland)-based CUHL, which is now known as
Capricorn UK Holdings.
The issue relates to
CUHL’s April 13, 2017, complaint to SEBI alleging non-payment of dividend of
around ₹340.65 crore by CIL, which merged with Vedanta on April 11, 2017.
Vedanta Resources acquired Cairn Energy’s majority stake in its Indian arm
Cairn India (CIL) in December 2011.
While Navin, who was
CIL chairman, has been restrained from accessing the securities market for two
months, Priya, who is a non-executive non-independent director on Vedanta’s
board, has been restrained for a month.
The Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) also barred then CIL whole-time director Tarun
Jain, CEO Thomas Albanes, and CFO GR Arun Kumar from dealing in securities for
two months.
Besides, then
independent directors K Venkataramanan, Lalita D Gupte, Aman Mehta, Ravi Kant
and Edward T Story have also been restrained from accessing the securities
market or dealing in them for a month, beginning March 12, 2024.
“Noticee No. 1
(Vedanta) shall pay to CUHL ₹77,62,55,052 i.e. simple interest @ 18 per cent per
annum for delayed payment of dividend, due and payable by Noticee No.1 to CUHL,
within 45 days from the date of this order,” the regulator said in the order.
In case of failure to
comply with the aforesaid direction, SEBI, on expiry of 45 days from the date
of this order, may initiate appropriate action against the company, it added.
Vedanta in a March 12 filing with BSE said it is in
the process of taking appropriate legal steps in respect to the SEBI order. However, the development has “no major financial
impact” on the oil-to-iron ore conglomerate.
CIL, in its defence,
had told the regulator that it had deposited unpaid dividend amount in a
special account called unpaid dividend account and did not benefit from the
unpaid dividend during April 1, 2016 to June 15, 2017.
However, the regulator
said the “purpose of award of interest”
is to compensate for the time value of money that the person was unlawfully
deprived of his entitlement.
“The purpose of award
of interest is not to eliminate enrichment of the wrong doer. Its purpose is to reflect loss caused to
the claimant or person who has been wrongfully deprived of his entitlement,” it
added.