Industry body the Royal Belgian Shipowners'
Association has published a new study highlighting what it sees
as flaws in the IMO's
Carbon Intensity
Indicator formula.
The organisation has
published the study in partnership with students from the Antwerp Management School,
it said in an emailed statement.
The research sets out the
following three variables in the formula with the most adverse impact on CII
ratings:
·
Waiting Time: Time spent idling or waiting in ports or awaiting
orders.
·
Number of Ports of Call: The frequency with which a ship docks
at different ports.
·
Distance Travelled: The total nautical miles covered by the
vessel.
"These findings underscore the multifaceted nature of CII
ratings. If the IMO aims to maintain the CII as a meaningful measure to
incentivise shipping's decarbonisation, a thorough review of the formula is
necessary, taking into account the various factors beyond the control of both
shipowners and charterers that influence the CII ratings," the shipping
body said in the statement.
"At a higher level, the scope and goal of the CII within
the basket of measures needs to be reassessed as well.
"Shipping is the most
efficient way of transporting goods, emitting the lowest GHG per ton of
transported cargo. Addressing the carbon efficiency of the sector requires the
effort of every stakeholder involved, from shipowners and charterers to port
authorities and customers.
"Placing the responsibility for a ship's efficiency solely
on the shipowner does not accurately address the complexities and other
influencing factors that exist."