The main tunnel of the 900 MW Arun III Hydropower Project, being
constructed with Indian assistance has achieved a breakthrough, with Nepal
Prime Minister Pushpakamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’ on June 5,
triggering the last blast to mark the completion of heading excavation. Prime
Minister ‘Prachanda’ attended an event to mark the completion of
heading excavation for the 11.8 km-long Head Race Tunnel of the 900 MW
Arun- 3 Hydro Electric Project in the Sankhuwasabha District in eastern
Nepal.
The length of
this Head Race Tunnel is 11.83 km from Fyaksindha to the exit of
Pukhuwa; The 900 MW hydropower project being constructed
on the Arun River with a budget of about USD 1.4
billion, is a run-off-the-river type project whose construction
started in May 2018; The Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam (SJVN) was
awarded with the project through international competitive bidding in
March 2008. The Investment Board Nepal and SJVN signed an
agreement for the development of the Arun III project in November 2014.
As of now, around 75 per cent of the project work has
already been completed, and the remaining work is progressing in full swing.
Along with this, the work on the 217 km-long associated transmission
line is also in progress.
According to the agreement, SJVN will
provide 21.9 per cent of the monthly generated energy free of
cost, which is expected to be equivalent to Rs 155 billion, and pay
another Rs 107 billion in royalties over the next 25 years of its
commercial operation;
·
The project is expected to provide direct economic benefits amounting
to Rs 348 billion in the form of dividends, income
tax, VAT, and customs, including the 21.9 energy and royalty,
over the 25 years of commercial operation, after which the project’s
ownership will be handed over to the Nepal government. Arun III was
conceptualised in the mid-1980s and redesigned in the nineties
as a two-stage project of 201 MW each, planned for funding by
a consortium of international donors led by the IDA of the World Bank. However, the project fell into the
backburner after the World Bank withdrew from the project due to criticism over
multiple aspects of the project–its project design, implementation plan,
and negative environmental impacts.