Under scrutiny is the proposed
legislation that will see the collaboration ofSouth Korean ports at Busan,
Ulsan and Masan with the US northwestern ports of Seattle, Tacoma and Everett
to develop green corridors, initially for pure car and truck carriers and
container ships.Proposals for the
legislation were based primarily on a report published by a NGO, Solutions for
Our Climate (SFOC) which advocates for decarbonisation across a number of key
industries, including oil and gas and power generation, among others.
SFOC shipping lead John Yum, toldSeatrade Maritime News that its
report entitled, A Study on South Korea’s 2050 Net Zero Pathway for Shipping,
which was published in Late September, aided in developing the regulatory
proposals."This initiative, led by Daerim Moon and 14 lawmakers, has given
the government and related agencies the time to review the regulation and to
act on it,” said Yum.
Essentially the
SFOC report builds on an agreement made between South Korea and the US at COP27
to establish green shipping corridors between the two countries, and that was
followed up at COP28 with a declaration to commence sea trials of the green
corridor by 2028.
According to Yum the proposed bill only
allows for zero emission fuels, 100% carbon free, but the enforcement decree, a
subset of the bill, will establish the details for the law.“Under the bill,
the term "Green Shipping Route" refers to a route designated and
announced by the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries where Green Ships operate
between two or more environmentally friendly ports using zero-carbon fuels and
eco-friendly technologies, and no carbon is emitted throughout the entire
maritime transportation process,” he explained.
Moreover, Yum
confirmed that the bill defines a ‘Green Ship’ as a ship that uses zero-carbon
fuel as a power source, “as specified by Presidential Decree”.He added: “The
specific mention of zero-carbon fuel is significant as it excludes so-called
'bridge-fuels' based on fossil fuels, such asLNG.”
The Green Corridor bill itself
accelerates South Korea’s decarbonisation plans and would see initial costs
ballon to around $65 billion up to 2030, for the South Korean transition. Funds that would come from a combination of
private and public finances, said Yum.
In conclusion the
report suggests that the IMO’s Net0 scenario requires a shift to a fuel mix
focused on green methanol, ammonia and hydrogen to achieve its net-zero
emissions by 2050.
“Gray methanol, blue hydrogen, and blue
ammonia—which have higher GHG emission factors (EF) than their greener
counterparts—find themselves economically unviable due to rising carbon prices
under net-zero scenarios. Therefore, a transition to carbon-free fuels must
ultimately define the future of maritime shipping,” according to the SFOC.That
future includes planning for a 38% increase in costs through tax reforms and
“enhancements” of the financial system to encourage investment in the maritime
transition.
Moreover,
government must establish a three-pronged strategy that involves government,
industry, and research institutes to lead the eco-friendly ship fuel market.