Ranking among the
world’s top five seafood exporters, India recently achieved an all-time high export
volume of 1.78 million tonnes (mt) of marine production, valued at ₹60,523.89
crore ($7,381.89 million). Yet Indian
seafood struggles with strong brand value.While Norwegian Salmon, Japanese
Sushi, Mediterranean Sea bass, and others command immediate recognition and
premium value, Indian seafood is still waiting to carve out a similar global
identity. The disparity is more baffling when we look at the data.
India, the world’s third-largest seafood
producer, generates ten times Norway’s volume—an astounding 17.5 mt annually.
Yet, its market capitalisation stands at less than one-tenth of Norway’s (under
$2 billion), with an export value that falls way further behind. One could argue that India is not in a
position to extract similar value in any food supply chain with the resources
at hand. However, unlike other food commodities, seafood presents a unique
opportunity—it caters to high-value, high-capita markets such as the US and
Europe. Imagine if India ups its game in terms of extracting value per tonne...
we are looking at potentially transforming this sector into a mammoth $80
billion export powerhouse.
This is an enormous value-creation opportunity. To put this in perspective... India seafood export alone could grow to become
almost twice the size of cumulative agri export, which is now pegged at nearly
$50 billion. First, global brand
identity... Norwegian salmon commands premium shelf space, Chilean sea bass
is sought after, Thai and Japanese seafood dominate the ready-to-eat sections. Indian supply, even as it significantly
stocks shelves across seafood counters, remains largely anonymous in the US
while struggling to stand out in discerning markets like Europe.
Second, tech-led infrastructure and regulatory
compliance. India’s seafood
industry relies on outdated technology... Rigorous adherence to
government-mandated regulations remains a challenge for many Indian seafood
exporters. The tech infrastructure gaps
result in significant value loss.
Third, a void for vertically integrated players. The most significant barrier is the absence of
large vertically integrated players within India’s seafood sector...Since we do
not have a front-end presence, we cannot funnel back consumer insights, which
is indispensable to staying ahead of the curve for innovation. All is not lost. India’s advantages are
undeniable. The global market is
transforming rapidly, driven by health-conscious consumers choosing seafood
over traditional meat-based proteins, a growing demand for sustainability, and
a rising preference for premium products that can be traced back to its source...India
should play to its strength by leveraging its traditional wisdom and augmenting
it with modern thinking.
By combining its
abundance of supply, proven prowess in technology...India can transition from
being a raw material supplier to a global leader brand. Let’s outline the steps
this would entail. Government support is
foundational...Effective policies and regulations to promote sustainable
fishing and aquaculture practices are a must. We can learn from how the
Norwegian government played an active role in elevating the credibility of the
country’s seafood quality...National
branding strategies have transformed several countries into premium food hubs...
The scope of incentives should extend to
include technological solutions...As digitisation becomes an imminent theme
in organizing global supply chains, India can position itself as an exporter of
commodities and also technologies that transform the value chain...Market
signals are unambiguous...we are looking
at India’s next sunrise sector with a potential market capitalization of over
$200 billion on the stock exchange, redefining the future of India’s economy
and global trade standing.