Support grows for the GHG levy, as more countries see it as a viable measure to meet climate and equity goals of the IMO

Marie Fricaudet, PhD Student at the UCL Energy Institute, said “The ISWG-GHG 18 meeting has advanced key elements of the MARPOL Annex VI amendment, keeping the process on track for finalization at MEPC 83, but significant decisions remain on the economic measures.”

Whilst the meeting is not in itself a decision point, it is a key meeting leading up to the much-anticipated Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) 83rd meeting to be held in April 2025, which is a decision point for the agreement/approval of the IMO’s mid-term measures. ISWG-GHG 18 closed with successful further ‘tidying up’ of the options and draft language, but with a predictable number of key decisions and further work needed to finalise the draft MARPOL amendment (Chapter 5 and accompanying revisions to other chapters). Overall, the process is on track to achieve finalisation in April following further intersessional dialogue between member states, the final ISWG-GHG 19 meeting, and further work done during MEPC 83 itself.

Dr Annika Frosch, Research Fellow at the UCL Energy Institute, said: “Support for the levy continues to grow, with 66% of MARPOL Annex VI signatories. This reflects a diverse coalition that includes key flag states, including backing from African nations, Small Island Developing States (SIDS), and Least Developed Countries (LDCs).”

The meeting followed on from an IMO expert workshop focused on food security. This reflected in discussions during the week around the subject of revenue distribution. The draft MAPROL amendment has broad support to include a fund, but whilst the architecture discussion remains unresolved, the expected quantum of the fund is uncertain. However, progress was made in discussions around what the fund could be used for, with a range of options (including those put forwards in 18/2/5), being forwarded. There is broad support for revenues to be used to reward (subsidise) early adoption of zero and near-zero GHG emission fuels, as well as RD&D. There is also broad support for using revenues to assist low-income countries, including to address Disproportionate Negative Impacts (which includes in most member state’s preferences the addressing of food security risks). Elements of just and equitable transition are therefore appearing in detail in the draft amendment text. However, there remains a need to finalise a decision on whether an alternative option for reducing risks on low-income countries (a reduction in required GFI for ships servicing certain selected ports), is also included. Pinar Majidova, Research Fellow at the UCL Energy Institute, said “Revenue distribution remains a central discussion point, with strong support for using funds to accelerate the adoption of zero and near-zero GHG emission fuels, as well as to support a just and equitable transition.”

During the week, in an effort to explore a way forwards without having to choose between the options, the Working Group Chair put forwards a draft of compromise text, based on a paper submitted by Singapore to MEPC 83. This concept, whilst relatively new, was found to be severely lacking in its ability to achieve the core objectives of mid-term measures identified in IMO’s 2023 Revised Strategy i.e. effectively promoting an energy transition and contributing to a just and equitable transition. The concept did not gain support, but will be forwarded in an annex, separate to the core base amendment text for further development at ISWG-GHG 19, remaining an option for further development if required.