There is a perception that the shipping industry is
one of the most corrupt. Do you agree?
I
wouldn’t concur entirely with that perception. While there is some truth to it,
corruption in any industry is often a reflection of the larger societal
environment. There is no documented,
empirical evidence to claim that the shipping industry is the most corrupt.
Corruption exists across sectors, and unless we address it systematically, it
will continue to manifest in various forms.
How serious is corruption in the maritime industry,
especially in the Indian subcontinent,?
The
issue is significant. In 2011, the Maritime Anti-Corruption Network (MACN) was
founded by Maersk to uphold business integrity. Today, MACN has grown into a
global movement with over 220 companies committed to combating corruption. If India wants to achieve its economic
growth goals and improve its ease of doing business ranking, tackling
corruption is crucial. Though the process is tedious and complex, we have made
a start, and there is a growing awareness in the industry. Where does India
rank in maritime corruption? There is no specific ranking for corruption in the
shipping industry. However, global indices like Transparency International’s
Corruption Perception Index rank India between 70 and 100 among 193 nations.
Given that India is the world’s fifth-largest economy, this is entity, followed
by port administrations...What actions have been taken against corrupt
officials?
In most cases, we have successfully
recovered concerning.
It calls for serious introspection by policymakers and the industry. MACN
focuses on corruption at ports, involving customs, immigration, quarantine,
port state control, and maritime administration. We operate globally in eight
key jurisdictions, including Nigeria, Argentina, Ukraine, Indonesia, Egypt and
South Asia (India, Bangladesh and Pakistan). We also have a reporting mechanism through a help desk, where ships can
notify us of corrupt practices.
What are the major pain points reported by the
shipping industry?
The most common grievances
involve customs and immigration. Issues range from delays in granting port
clearance to demands for bribes. Some cases arise due to incomplete or
incorrect declarations by shipmasters, which customs officials can legally act
upon...Our
interventions have led to a 100 per cent success rate in reported cases.
What reforms have you proposed to tackle systemic
issues?
We
have submitted policy recommendations to the government, focusing on business
process re-engineering. Two key proposals include: Digitalizing Port Clearance
(PC):..Single-Window Reporting: Ships currently submit redundant information to
multiple agencies (customs, immigration, port health, etc.), leading to
inefficiencies. We proposed a centralized electronic submission system, aligned
with IMO’s Facilitation (FAL) Convention. This, too, is being adopted by the
Indian government.
What should public and private stakeholders do to
curb corruption?
...Private sector companies must actively
engage with MACN and ensure their crews file Pre-Arrival Notices (PANs) with
us. Currently, only about 2,100 PANs are filed annually, compared to 25,000
port calls, which leaves us blindsided in many cases. On the government side,
we have conducted training workshops for customs officials to sensitize them.
There is a growing recognition that corruption must be tackled, and our efforts
have led to an improved port user experience. What has been the overall
impact of MACN’s initiatives in India? ...MACN’s initiatives have
potentially saved the industry around $6 million in avoided delays and extorted
payments. While much remains to be done, we are making steady progress in
transforming India’s maritime sector into a more transparent and efficient
space. This is a long journey, but we
are on the right path.