Ministry officials
stated that the decision follows a request from textile millers, who have long
argued that yarn imports through land ports undermine local industry. Instead,
they proposed that yarn, a key raw material for the ready-made garment (RMG)
industry, should be imported only through seaports.
Apparel exporters have expressed concerns that
restricting yarn imports through land ports could negatively impact small and
medium-sized factories that rely on them for easier and more cost-effective
access to raw materials. “The sudden ban will put additional pressure on small
factories, particularly those in border areas, which depend on land ports for
quick and flexible imports. This could lead to financial distress,” said a
senior official from the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters
Association.
The Bangladesh Textile
Mills Association (BTMA), representing spinning and textile mill owners, made
the request for the ban in a letter to Finance Adviser Salehuddin Ahmed…In its letter, BTMA warned that allowing continued
yarn imports through land ports would cause irreparable damage to the country’s
textile sector, increasing reliance on imported yarn and leading to higher
import costs and unemployment. Meanwhile,
industry leaders warn that the move could disrupt the supply chain, increase
production costs, and affect Bangladesh’s competitiveness in the global apparel
market.
Larger factories can source materials through seaports
or local suppliers, but smaller manufacturers often lack these alternatives.
Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters
Association (BKMEA) BKMEA Executive President Fazlee Shamim Ehsan said, “While
we understand the government’s concerns, a complete ban may not be the best
approach. Instead, improving monitoring and customs procedures at land ports
would be a more effective solution.” Exporters
and industry leaders have urged the government to reconsider the decision,
suggesting phased implementation or exemptions for smaller factories to
mitigate the impact…The BTMA letter highlighted the risks of yarn imports,
noting that land ports such as Benapole, Bhomra, Sona Masjid, and Banglabandha
lack proper infrastructure, yarn count measuring equipment, skilled manpower,
and effective oversight.
As a result, import and export trade is not being
efficiently managed.
Additionally,
textile mills face unfair competition due to the marketing of unauthorised
yarn, often imported through land ports with false customs declarations. This
practice not only harms local industries but also results in significant
revenue losses for the government. The
letter further stated that the policy permitting partial shipments has been
widely misused, allowing multiple imports under the same letter of credit
beyond approved limits.
BTMA suggested that shifting yarn imports to seaports
would help protect the domestic textile sector and preserve valuable foreign
exchange. Seaports, they argued, have superior infrastructure, including
high-quality scanners and yarn count measuring machines, and typically process
imports within 13 to 15 days. During a
meeting at the Ministry of Commerce yesterday (24 March), its secretary,
Mahbubur Rahman, requested BTMA to provide supporting documents regarding
allegations of dumping practices by Indian exporters.He noted that India
has imposed anti-dumping duties on several goods from different countries,
including Bangladesh, and assured that if the claim is substantiated, the
government will take necessary action. BKMEA
Executive President Fazlee Shamim Ehsan echoed the proposal for imposing
anti-dumping duties, advocating for stronger regulatory measures to ensure fair
trade practices.