Geopolitics are more complex than usual in today’s fast-moving tanker
market, but two brokers have separately
identified developments that could provide a boost for the VLCC market.
In
their latest market reports, New York-based Poten & Partners and London’s
Gibson Shipbrokers outline factors that could strengthen the VLCC market in the future. On the one hand, Poten explains why the shifting
backdrop of Iranian oil sanctions could affect crude oil trade; on the other,
Gibson points to possible increases in US oil
exports under President Trump’s Administrations.
US sanctions on Iran have been on and
off for many years, slapped on first by President Carter in 1979. Following
successive on-offs during different administrations, 2015 saw Iran and UN
security council members (plus Germany) agree the Iran nuclear deal, part of
which was for the US and the EU to provide sanctions relief. This led to a boost in Iranian oil exports
and between January 2016 and May 2018, when President Trump pulled the US out
of the Iran nuclear deal, Iran exported an average of 2.5m barrels of crude
oil a day. China and India were
the country’s largest customers and tankers from Iran and other nations shipped
the oil.
However, when the US reintroduced
sanctions from 2018, Iran became dependent on the so-called ‘dark fleet’ which
subsequently expanded dramatically in 2022 when Russian oil was also
sanctioned. Over the last three years, the dark fleet is estimated to have
grown by a factor of three or four, perhaps numbering as many as 1,000 tankers
today.
Poten notes the growing influence of
the US Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) which monitors ships that carry
oil cargoes between certain countries, including oil exports from
producers Russia and Iran.
Since the beginning of 2024, OFAC has steadily added tankers to the sanctions
list for both countries, Poten notes, thereby reducing the pool of non-sanctioned
dark vessels.
Iran has targeted China’s so-called
teapot refineries, small privately-owned facilities which have been key takers
of Iranian crude at discounted prices. But OFAC now has these Chinese importers
in its sights and could undermine buying strategies. This could force the
refineries to turn to other long-haul crude imports from other Middle Eastern
or African countries, boosting demand for VLCCs trading in the open market.
Gibson, meanwhile, cites President Trump’s impact
on tanker trades as another potential VLCC driver. In recent years, the broker points out, several
US oil export projects to Asia went on hold, with permitting plagued by
bureaucracy and climate goals. They include the Sea Port Oil Terminal (SPOT),
to be located off Freeport Texas, Blue Water Texas, Texas GulfLink (TGL), and
Blue Marlin.
Now, though, in Trump’s second-term, US energy
producers are back on the hydrocarbon trail. The SPOT terminal’s final
investment decision has been delayed but, Gibson reports, there could soon be
moves to take it forward. SPOT is just one of the facilities that could be
reinvigorated under the new Administration’s strategy. The impact of their
development would favour the VLCC sector because the US crude exports would be
shipped on long-haul trades.
Suezmax and Aframax tankers would not stand to
gain so much, Gibson suggests, although both sizes could contribute to rising
exports on trades where draught constraints are a factor.