Some
factories, particularly those reliant on US orders, have shuttered their
operations entirely. Many more are grappling with abrupt order cancellations
and an atmosphere of uncertainty that makes future planning nearly impossible,”
said Monroe.
According to Monroe, the tariffs on imports and the additional Section
301 costs from the fees that will be imposed in less than six months could mean
that America is, “staring down the barrel of a full-scale trade freeze”. The
analyst further asks if the US public is, “truly prepared for empty shelves at
major retailers? Because if the current trajectory continues unchecked, that
could very well be our new reality.” As
time passes and the trade dispute remains unresolved there is an increasing air
of uncertainty in the US and in US businesses.
The trade war has thrown business leaders and their forecasts into
disarray: “Companies across multiple sectors, from consumer electronics to automotive
and retail, are now struggling to plan for inventory, pricing, and supply chain
logistics amid an unpredictable policy environment,” claimed Monroe.
If shippers are scratching their heads, their service providers are,
for once, in sync with the carriers also reassessing how they should serve the
US market, according to MDS Transmodal analyst Antonella Teodoro. “While the
proposed fees on Chinese-built vessels won’t be enforced until later in 2025,
several shipping lines ought to start exploring potential workarounds to limit
their exposure. Among the most plausible
responses are supply chain diversification strategies, with operators seeking
to preserve market access while avoiding or delaying the cost burden associated
with the new US port fee regime,” said Teodoro.
Several options could be available to the lines, said Teodoro,
including a hub and spoke reconfiguration of services, with Chinese-built
vessels calling at regional ports and their cargo shipped to the US via a
feeder or shuttle service.
Another possibility is to use slot
agreements with alliance partners, a system that might benefit COSCO, whose
fleet is particularly exposed to the Section 301 rules.
Other options could be to ship freight to Mexican and/or Canadian
ports and to use road and rail to deliver cargo to US destinations, thereby
avoiding the port call fees, but Teodoro points out that this adds to the costs
and complexity of supply chains.
“While the full administrative framework
around the new fees is still emerging, carriers are clearly exploring various
ways to soften the potential commercial impact. Whether these adaptations lead
to long-term structural shifts or remain temporary measures will depend on how
aggressively the policy is implemented - and how the market responds,”
concluded Teodoro